SALT LAKE CITY (AP) A condemned killer appears headed for a date with death in Utah that could see him sit before a firing squad – a development that would likely re-ignite protests over an antiquated, Old West-style of justice.
At a hearing Friday, 3rd District Judge Robin Reese will consider whether to sign a warrant of execution for Ronnie Lee Gardner, who killed a man during a failed prison escape 25 years ago.
Under state law Gardner, 49, would be allowed to decide whether he would be killed by lethal injection or by being shot by a five-man team of executioners firing from a set of matched rifles, a rarely used relic that harkens back to Utah’s territorial history.
Of the 35 states with the death penalty on the books, Utah is the only one to use the firing squad as a method of execution since the U.S. Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment in 1976.
Two men have died in a hail of bullets since that decision: Gary Gilmore, on Jan. 17, 1977 – after famously uttering the last words, “Let’s do it” – and John Albert Taylor on Jan. 26, 1996.
Oklahoma is the only other state that considers a firing squad an acceptable option, but by law would only use it if lethal injection was deemed unconstitutional. The state has never used the method.
Utah’s death row inmates were for decades allowed to choose how they wanted to die. State lawmakers removed that choice in 2004 and made lethal injection the default method, but inmates sentenced before then still have a choice.
The repeal of the firing squad wasn’t tied to any discomfort with the method itself. Rather, state lawmakers disliked the heaps of negative media attention that firing squads focused on the state, said state lawmaker Sheryl Allen, who twice carried legislation to change the law.
In 1996, more than 150 media outlets descended on Utah to cover Taylor’s execution, painting the firing squad as an “Old West” style of justice that allows killers to go out in a blaze of glory that embarrasses the state.
“I was just hoping to end that focus,” said Allen, adding that she’s displeased with the prospect of another firing squad execution. “I fear that the proper attention will not be paid to the victims of the crime and the atrocity of the crime.”
Lawmakers did not retroactively ban the firing squad out of fear that it would give condemned inmates a new avenue of appeal, she said.
At least four of the 10 men on Utah’s death row, including Gardner, have said they want to die by firing squad. However, a warrant for Gardner’s execution from the 1990s lists his preference as lethal injection, so it’s unclear which method he’ll choose.
Defense attorneys, who declined comment ahead of Friday’s hearing, have asked Reese not to sign the warrant and convert the sentence to life in prison without the possibility of parole. They say killing Gardner after 25 years on death row amounts to cruel and unusual punishment.
Assistant Utah Attorney General Tom Brunker disagrees and said that because Gardner has exhausted all avenues of appeal, he should be put to death.
If the warrant is signed, the Department of Corrections would hold the execution on a date that is more than 30 days, but less than 60 days, from the judge’s decision.
A stay of the execution could still be sought. Gardner could also ask the state’s Board of Pardons and Parole to commute his sentence.
Lydia Kalish, Amnesty International’s death penalty abolition coordinator for Utah, said her organization opposes the state’s effort to see Gardner executed. But despite Utah’s strong religious roots – it’s the home of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints – most here support the use of the death penalty.
“I think in Utah, when it suits their purposes, they go back to the Old Testament and the ‘eye for an eye’ kind of thing,” Kalish said. “These people may be the worst of the worst, but if the best we can do is repeat the same thing, it’s so obviously wrong.”