It still seems strange that the prisons director chooses who is on the parole board…
July 6th 2012
COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — The Ohio prisons director has added three members to the state parole board after removing two others with little explanation.
The nine-person board considers release requests from thousands of inmates, along with clemency requests from condemned prisoners.
The newest members include Andre Imbrogno, a former Department of Rehabilitation and Correction attorney. The others are Marc Houk, a former warden at several prisons, and Ron Nelson, a longtime DRC administrator.
They were appointed by prisons director Gary Mohr and started their duties July 2.
Democratic state Rep. Tracy Maxwell Heard of Columbus alleged last month the removals of Jose Torres and Cathy Collins-Taylor were politically motivated, because both were appointed by former Democratic Gov. Ted Strickland.
The prisons system said Mohr selects career-oriented corrections professionals committed to his reform efforts.
OH PW was alerted to this headline by someone who rightly asked: how is it possible that the prisons director has a say in who is on the Parole Board? And that this director can remove people from this Board? Sounds like a conflict of interest?
“The members who were removed had participated in the most recent clemency decision, (death row inmate John Eley) with one in favor of mercy and the other against it.”
From: Youngstown Vindicator:
June 22nd 2012
The prosecutor who helped secure the death sentence of John Eley (pictured) and one of the presiding judges who sentenced him to death recently asked the Ohio Parole Board to recommend clemency instead. Former Mahoning County prosecutor Gary Van Brocklin told the state parole board that Eley should be spared from execution because the type of crime he committed is no longer usually prosecuted as a death penalty case and is not so egregious as to deserve capital punishment. Van Brocklin said, “It wasn’t in the more heinous nature of cases that now receive the death penalty.” Van Brocklin also said that Eley was acting under the instruction of a man named Melvin Green, who was the mastermind behind the shooting. Green was acquitted of the murder, in part because Eley refused to testify against him.
Judge Peter C. Economus, who is now a federal judge but who had voted for Eley’s death sentence in Ohio, wrote to the Parole Board, saying he originally agreed with the death sentence only because Eley’s attorneys presented little mitigating evidence: “If I had been presented the additional mitigating evidence outlined in the clemency petition at the time of the trial, especially evidence of Mr. Eley’s low intellectual functioning, his impoverished childhood, his significant alcohol and substance abuse, and his probable brain impairment, I would have voted for a sentence less than death.” The judge asked that clemency be given and expressed surprise that the sentence had not been lowered earlier by the courts.
Attorneys for John Eley presented evidence of his mental disabilities, alcohol and drug abuse, and of his mental illness in their petition for clemency. Eley is scheduled for execution on July 26 unless Governor John Kasich decides to spare his life.
(“Prosecutor seeks mercy for condemned Ohio killer,” Associated Press, June 13, 2012; letter of Judge Economus to Ohio Parole Board and Gov. Kasich, June 7, 2012).
See Clemency and New Voices. Listen to DPIC’s audio podcast on Clemency.
UPDATE: Follow-up letter of Van Brocklin to Ohio Parole Board, June 13, 2012.
UPDATE: Ohio Parole Board voted 5-3 against recommending clemency, but noted the statements of the former prosecutor and judge. Gov. Kasich will make the final decision on clemency, and does not have to follow the Board’s recommendation.
Keep following the Updates here